Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality of the studies included in the SRMA based on the AMSTAR tool

From: Predictors of institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia: an umbrella review

Author, Year

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Q11

Total

Kebede A. et al., 2016 [27]

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

5

Nigusie A. et al., 2020 [23]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

10

Dessie A.M., et al., 2023 [22]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

11

Tenaw L.A., et al., 2023 [24]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

11

Fekadu G.A., et al., 2018 [31]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

9

  1. AMSTAR Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews. Q1: A priori design; Q2: Duplicate study selection and data extraction; Q3: Comprehensiveness of search; Q4: Grey literature inclusion; Q5: Have inclusion and exclusion of studies; Q6: Included studies’ characteristics provided; Q7: Scientific quality of the primary studies assessed and documented; Q8: Scientific quality of included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions; Q9: Appropriateness of methods used to combine studies’ findings; Q10: Likelihood of publication bias was assessed; Q11: Conflict of interest– potential sources of support were clearly acknowledged in both the systematic review and the included studies