Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of perinatal outcomes in Singleton deliveries among the three groups

From: Live birth rate and perinatal outcomes following sequential embryo transfer in women with recurrent implantation failure undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

 

Seq-ET(n = 115)

D3-dET (n = 324)

D5/6-dET (n = 176)

P value

Singleton deliveries

94 (81.7%)

252 (77.8%)

135 (76.7%)

0.574

Gestational week

38.43 ± 2.09

38.45 ± 1.80

38.05 ± 1.88§

0.013

Preterm delivery

13 (13.8%)

22 (8.7%)

20 (14.8%)

0.169

Birth weight (g)

3267.6 ± 666.5

3201.7 ± 501.3

3254.5 ± 522.5

0.373

Birth length (cm)

49.64 ± 2.84

49.97 ± 1.90

49.88 ± 1.97

0.941

Low birthweight

10 (9.9%)

13 (5.2%)

10 (7.5%)

0.353

Macrosomia

11 (11.7%) £

8 (3.2%)

5 (3.7%)

0.005

SGA

5 (5.3%)

18 (7.1%)

10 (7.4%)

0.801

LGA

14 (14.9%)

24 (9.5%)

23 (17.0%)

0.083

GDM

10 (10.6%%)

29 (11.5%)

14 (10.4%)

0.906

GHD

5 (5.3%)

10 (4.0%)

3 (2.2%)

0.461

Female sex

44 (46.8%)

123 (48.8%)

70 (51.9%)

0.737

  1. SGA, small for gestational age; LGA, large for gestational age; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; GHD, gestational hypertensive disease
  2. §Blastocyst embryo transfer vs. sequential embryo transfer and cleavage-stage embryo transfer
  3. £Sequential embryo transfer vs. cleavage-stage embryo transfer and blastocyst embryo transfer
Back to article page

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

ISSN: 1471-2393

Contact us