Skip to main content

Effects of psychosocial factors on postpartum depression: a half-longitudinal mediation analysis of cognitive reactivity

Abstract

Background

The prevention and treatment of perinatal depression are currently the focus of perinatal health care, with cognitive reactivity confirmed to be an important predictor. However, how cognitive reactivity mediates the relationship between psychosocial factors (e.g. family function, perceived stress, mindfulness, and insomnia) and perinatal depression remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the mediating role of cognitive reactivity between psychosocial factors and perinatal depression.

Methods

Based on a half-longitudinal design, this study investigated 368 perinatal women from China in the third trimester (T1) and three months postpartum (T2) using the Perceived Stress Scale, Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale, Athens Insomnia Scale, Family Adaptation Partnership Growth Affection and Resolve Index, Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity, and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling.

Results

The overall fit of the hypothetical structural model is acceptable. The analysis confirmed a direct relationship between family function, perceived stress, mindfulness, and insomnia at T1, and cognitive reactivity at T2. Factors other than mindfulness at T1 had a direct effect on perinatal depression at T2. Furthermore, cognitive reactivity at T2 mediated the influences of family function, perceived stress, mindfulness, and insomnia at T1 on perinatal depression at T2.

Conclusions

Cognitive reactivity levels in the third trimester were stable predictors and mediators of postpartum depression. Effective strategies to reduce cognitive reactivity in perinatal women should focus on enhancing family function, mindfulness, and sleep quality and in guiding women toward adopting positive coping styles to alleviate stress levels, ultimately reducing postpartum depression.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Perinatal depression (PND) refers to an episode of depression experienced by some women during pregnancy and up to one year after delivery [1]. It is divided into prenatal and postpartum depression, often occurring in late pregnancy and up to three months after delivery [2]. In China, the incidence of PND ranges from 3.0 to 68.4%, with a rapid increase reported of 9% per year [3]. Therefore, it has become a focal point in perinatal healthcare. Women with PND struggle to adapt to changes after pregnancy, feel helpless or isolated, and may withdraw from social activities [4]. Severe depression may even lead to suicide or infanticide, placing a heavy burden on perinatal women, their families, and society at large [5].

According to Beck’s cognitive vulnerability theory [6], dysfunctional attitudes play a crucial role in the development of depression following stressful life events. The activation of dysfunctional attitudes through sadness has been termed cognitive reactivity (CR) [7]. Previous studies have demonstrated that CR stability is a predictor of the onset and recurrence of depression. It has been reported that with every 10-point increase in the CR score, the risk of depression recurrence increases by 20% [8]. Similarly, CR has been shown to account for 45% of first-episode depression and 53% of recurrent depression among college students [9]. While studies in this area are limited, a positive predictive relationship has been observed between CR and depression levels at six weeks postpartum in perinatal women, marking the first investigation of CR in this population [10]. Therefore, exploring CR as a point of entry to understand the mechanism of PND holds promise for its prevention and treatment, which is crucial for enhancing maternal and infant health.

The available evidence suggests that CR and PND are influenced by multiple physiological, psychological, and social factors. Negative correlations have been reported between CR and sleep quality [11]. A longitudinal survey indicated that poor sleep quality during the third trimester exacerbates the risk of postnatal depression, with sleep quality having a dynamic effect on depressive symptoms in early pregnancy [12]. Positive psychological factors such as mindfulness have been identified as crucial protective factors against CR. Scholars have observed that higher levels of individual mindfulness are associated with lower CR levels and a reduced likelihood of depression or recurrence [8, 13]. Furthermore, stressors have been found to be positively correlated with CR [14], while high stress and adverse life events during pregnancy have been widely linked to the occurrence and progression of PND [15]. A Turkish study identified family dysfunction as a critical factor in the development of postpartum depressive symptoms [16]. According to multifactor system theory related to stress [17], the generation of stress responses includes three parts: stressors, mediating variables, and stress response, with cognitive factors at the core. Despite the established associations between the aforementioned psychosocial factors and CR and PND, the exact pathways through which CR mediates the impact of these factors on PND remain unclear. Further research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Therefore, this study used CR as a mediating variable to examine the roles of various psychosocial factors (stressors) and stress response in relation to PND.

Mediation analyses aim to reveal how exposure leads to its hypothesised impact on outcomes [18]. Typically, all measurements should be separated in different wave studies. However, it has been argued that half-longitudinal mediation can be explored in two-wave studies [19]. Previous studies have successfully demonstrated the applicability of this statistical approach to illustrate the role of mediators [20]. Therefore, our study employed a half-longitudinal design to investigate the mediating effects of CR (baseline or follow-up) on the relationships between perceived stress, insomnia, mindfulness, family function (baseline), and PND (follow-up). The hypothetical model of this half-longitudinal study is depicted in Fig. 1. We propose the following hypotheses:

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hypothetical half-longitudinal mediation model

(1) hypothesis 1

(2) Perceived stress, insomnia, mindfulness, family function (baseline), and CR (either baseline or follow-up) have varying predictive effects on perinatal women’s experience of PND (follow-up).

(3) hypothesis 2

(4) Perceived stress, insomnia, mindfulness, and family function (baseline) have distinct predictive effects on CR (both baseline and follow-up) in perinatal women.

(5) hypothesis 3

(6) The relationship between perceived stress, insomnia, mindfulness, and family function (baseline) in perinatal women is associated with PND (follow-up) through the mediating effect of CR (either baseline or follow-up).

Methods

Study design

This two-wave prospective study was conducted in Fujian Province, China, between December 2021 and January 2023. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (No. 2022085), and all participants provided signed informed consent. Participants completed the baseline questionnaire in the third trimester (T1) and were followed up at three months postpartum (T2) through face-to-face interviews to assess levels of perceived stress, family function, insomnia, mindfulness, CR, and PND. This study adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement of von Elm et al. [21].

Participants

We enrolled 1426 pregnant patients from the obstetrical clinics and inpatient departments of three tertiary hospitals (level 3) in Fuzhou and Quanzhou City, Fujian Province, China. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age ≥ 20 years, (2) singleton pregnancy with gestational age ≥ 28 weeks confirmed by type-B ultrasonic test, (3) assessed as high-risk for PND with a score ≥ 58 on the 26-item Chinese version of the Leiden Index of Depression Sensitivity (LEIDS-RR-CV) and a score ≤ 12 on the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and (4) willingness to participate in a follow-up period of up to three months postpartum. Women with preexisting mental disorders or cognitive impairments were excluded from the study.

According to Pan et al. [22], determining the sample size for mediation analysis of longitudinal data requires 80% power, which depends on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effect sizes were denoted as SL for small (0.14), M for medium (0.39), L for large (0.59), and H for halfway (0.26). In this study, we selected an ICC of 0.2. With the effect size SL indicating βa = 0.14 and βb = 0.59, we opted for the most powerful bootstrapping method. The minimum sample size required was 278 patients. Factoring in a 15% attrition rate, we established that the required sample size should be at least 320.

Measurements

Exposure measures

Perceived stress scale (PSS-10)

The PSS-10 is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring overall levels of perceived stress [23]. Participants were asked to indicate how frequently they experienced certain feelings over the past month using a four-point Likert scale, ranging from “never” to “always”, with scores assigned from 0 to 4. The total PSS-10 score ranged from 0 to 40, with a higher score indicating a greater level of perceived stress [23]. Previous studies have reported that the PSS-10 demonstrates satisfactory internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and validity in pregnant and postpartum women [24, 25]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α in women at T1 was 0.822.

Cognitive and affective mindfulness scale – revised (CAMS-R)

The CAMS-R comprises 12 items organised into four dimensions: attention, present focus, awareness, and acceptance. Responses were rated on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from ‘never’ to ‘always’, with scores assigned from 1 to 4. The total score ranged from 12 to 48, with a higher total score indicating a higher level of mindfulness in the individual [26]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α in women at T1 was 0.905.

Athens INSOMNIA scale (AIS)

The AIS is an eight-item self-report scale that assesses insomnia in two domains: nocturnal sleep disturbance and daytime dysfunction, which includes daytime sleepiness. Each item is rated from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia conditions [27]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α in women at T1 was 0.813.

Family adaptation partnership growth affection and resolve index (APGAR)

The Family APGAR, developed by Smilkstein [28], is a well-established tool known for its reliability and validity. This scale assessed family members’ perceptions of family functioning by measuring their satisfaction with family relationships. It encompasses five parameters: adaptation, partnership, growth, affection, and resolve. Participants can choose from three response options: ‘almost always’, ‘sometimes’, or ‘hardly ever’, which correspond to scores of 2, 1, and 0 respectively. The total score is obtained by summing the points for each item, with higher scores indicating better family functioning. In this study, the Cronbach’s α in women at T1was 0.892.

Mediator measures

Chinese version of the Leiden index of depression sensitivity (LEIDS-RR-CV)

To assess CR, we used the 26-item self-report LEIDS-RR-CV, which encompasses five subscales: hopelessness/suicidality, acceptance/coping, aggression, control/perfectionism, and avoidant coping. Responses are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (“not at all” to “very strongly”), with higher scores indicating greater CR [29]. The LEIDS-RR-CV has demonstrated reliability and validity for quantifying CR among perinatal Chinese women and for screening for high-risk depression during this period [10]. This study found acceptable reliability for the overall scale score (Cronbach’s α = 0.875–0.895).

Outcome measures

Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS)

We employed the 10-item self-report EPDS, which is widely recognised as a primary screening tool for common depressive symptoms in both pre- and postpartum women [30]. Responses were rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3, with higher total scores indicating a higher presence of depressive symptoms (range: 0–30). The EPDS has been validated in numerous countries and has demonstrated robust psychometric properties in both pre- and postpartum contexts [31, 32]. A recommended cutoff score of 13 or higher is used when assessing the potential for PND [33]. In this study, the Cronbach’s α in women at T2 was 0.857.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics

We obtained the participants’ sociodemographic and clinical data from the medical record databases of the participating hospitals. This included information on maternal age, gestational week, whether the participant was the only daughter, marital status, education level, residential location, occupation, monthly household income (in RMB, ¥), number of pregnancies, number of children, and prenatal psychological screening.

Data analysis

Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 and R 4.2.3 software. All statistical tests were two-sided, with p <.05 used to indicate statistical significance. The parameter likelihood method [34] was used for the imputation and parameter estimation of missing values. The demographic variables, perceived stress, family function, mindfulness, CR, and PND are described as mean, standard deviation (SD), range, number (N), and percentage (%), as appropriate. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationships among these variables. The half-longitudinal mediation model was analysed using the R package “lavaan”. In the hypothetical model, CR at baseline or follow-up served as the mediation variable; baseline perceived stress, mindfulness, insomnia, and family function served as exposure variables; and PND was the outcome. The fit indices used in this study included the chi-square statistic (chi-squared), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA).

Results

Participant characteristics

In this study, a total of 1,426 questionnaires were distributed, and 1,409 valid responses were collected. Based on the measurement results, we identified 368 women at high risk of PND who met the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 329 women were followed up at three months postpartum, resulting in a 10.6% attrition rate (see Fig. 2).There were no significant differences in sociodemographic and clinical characteristics between our sample of 329 women and the 39 women who were excluded. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sample screening and loss to follow-up

Table 1 The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants

Correlations of variables

As shown in Table 2, Pearson analysis showed that the total PND scores at T2 were significantly positively correlated with CR (T1 and T2), perceived stress (T1), and insomnia (T1), and negatively correlated with family function (T1). However, the relationship between mindfulness (T1) and CR (T1) or PND (T2) was not significant (p >.05).

Table 2 Bivariate correlation among variables

Mediation analysis

The mediating effect of CR at T1 on the relationship between exposure variables (family function, perceived stress, mindfulness, and insomnia) at T1 and PND at T2 was statistically insignificant (p >.05), even after controlling for demographic and clinical variables. Table 3 lists the effect coefficients of the model mediated by CR at T1.

Table 3 Results of path relationship test for the model mediated by CR at T1

In contrast, CR at T2 significantly mediated the relationship between the exposure variables (family function, perceived stress, mindfulness, and insomnia) at T1 and PND at T2 (p <.05), after controlling for demographic and clinical variables (Fig. 3). The direct effects of family function, perceived stress, and insomnia on PND were significant (coefficients β = -0.45, 0.285, and 0.246, respectively), while a direct effect was not found for mindfulness (coefficient β = 0.031, 95% CI: -0.030–0.093). All mediation models exhibited acceptable fit indices, as follows: χ2(df), 14.27(8)–29.308(8); AIC, 4210.743–4299.358; BIC, 4260.092–4348.707; and RMSEA, 0.049–0.090. Table 4 lists the effect coefficients of the model mediated by CR at T2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The mediation of cognitive reactivity in the third trimester. *p <.05, **p <.01

Table 4 Results of path relationship test for the model mediated by CR at T2

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study to explore the mediating role of CR on psychosocial factors and PND. Our results not only indicated that CR was a stable predictor of PND but also elucidated the mechanisms through which different stressors influence PND levels. Specifically, we found that women in the third trimester with high levels of mindfulness and strong family functioning, coupled with low levels of perceived stress and insomnia, tended to exhibit reduced CR and depression in the postpartum period. These findings deepen understanding of the potential factors associated with reductions in PND and can aid in the development of more tailored interventions for women at a high risk of PND.

The first hypothesis proposed in this study was partially supported and clarified. Our findings align with previous studies demonstrating positive direct relationships between perceived stress and insomnia at T1 and PND at T2, while family function at T1 negatively predicted PND at T2 [16, 35]. Physiologically, higher perceived stress can lead to dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis and abnormal cortisol secretion, resulting in a depressive mood [36]. Sleep quality is crucial for mental health; however, physiological changes and psychological stressors during the third trimester can disrupt sleep patterns and contribute to the development of PND [37]. Additionally, family care is a vital component of the social support system for perinatal women, and this may be particularly affected by Chinese family culture, which traditionally views the family as an inseparable unit. Without adequate support and understanding from family members, women may experience increased feelings of loneliness, helplessness, and hopelessness, leading to increased depression [38].

Furthermore, we found that maternal CR levels positively predicted contemporaneous depression levels, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [8, 9] and which provides further evidence that CR is a stable predictor of depression occurrence or recurrence. According to the diathesis-stress model [39], psychological disorders result from interactions between individual diathesis factors and environmental stressors. Higher CR indicates a stronger association between negative emotions and negative cognition [40]. Thus, perinatal women with high CR levels may experience not only negative emotions but also intense dysfunctional self-cognition, self-evaluation, and self-blame attributions when facing stressful events, leading to depression [41]. In contrast to previous studies [42], we found no direct relationship between mindfulness and PND. One possible explanation for this inconsistency is that CR acts as an overarching mediating factor, attenuating the direct influence of mindfulness on PND.

Regarding the second hypothesis, in line with previous studies [9, 11, 13, 14], we observed that perceived stress and insomnia at T1 positively predicted CR at T2, while levels of mindfulness and family function at T1 were negatively associated with CR at T2. Individuals experiencing poorer sleep quality have been found to be more prone to reacting to negative moods through reactivating thoughts related to hopelessness or other negative states, leading to an elevation in CR [43]. Hormonal influences during the perinatal period may predispose women to negative thinking patterns in response to stress, resulting in self-perception bias and negative emotions such as worthlessness and sadness [44]. Some studies suggest that robust social support creates an environment conducive to interpreting stressful events positively and finding meaning in them [45]. This may explain why strong family functioning reduces maternal CR levels. Furthermore, according to mindfulness-to-meaning theory [46], mindfulness enables individuals to be aware of and analytically assess their negative emotions, allowing them to adjust their thought patterns and embrace an attitude of openness and acceptance rather than resistance or avoidance.

Consistent with previous studies [9], our findings indicated the significant mediating role of CR at T2, further validating multifactor system theory in relation to stress and providing strong theoretical support for the prevention and treatment of PND. Specifically, CR at T2 partially mediated the relationship between family function, perceived stress, and insomnia at T1 and PND at T2, and fully mediated the relationship between mindfulness at T1 and PND at T2. Strong family function and mindfulness can enhance the ability of perinatal women to cope with negative emotions, bolster their cognitive resilience, and consequently reduce the occurrence of depression [47, 48]. Moreover, good sleep quality enhances cognitive function and regulates emotional and stress levels in perinatal women, enabling them to better manage various tasks and role transitions after childbirth [49, 50]. An unexpected finding of this study was the absence of a significant mediating effect of CR at T1 between each stressor and PND. Therefore, the third hypothesis was only partially supported, which supports previous understanding that CR is activated when sadness reaches a certain threshold [8], and that this process requires a period of accumulation. However, owing to the lack of comparisons from relevant longitudinal studies, future research is needed to measure the dynamic mediating effect of CR with a greater number of time points.

Limitations

Although this study yields important findings, it is imperative to interpret these results within the context of their limitations. First, the follow-up period in this study was short, and future research could benefit from including additional measurement points, such as early pregnancy, mid-pregnancy, and 1 year postpartum, to provide a more comprehensive understanding and basis for the development of PND intervention programs. Second, while the model presented in this study is informative, it may not account for all variances in CR. Variables not included in our model, such as newborn-related factors, may influence CR. This highlights the need for future studies to explore these additional variables. Third, although the model demonstrated adequate fit based on our sample size, assessing its validity using a larger sample size is likely to enhance the robustness of the findings. In addition, this study relied solely on self-report scale measurements, which may not fully capture the complexity of PND. Future research should improve accuracy and reliability by incorporating psychiatric diagnoses conducted by professionals. Finally, CR was measured twice in this study, while all other measures were taken only once. The repeated use of the same scale for CR may have introduced biases due to increased familiarity or recall effects, which could have influenced participants’ responses. This could impact the reliability and validity of the CR measurements. Future studies may consider using alternative methods or additional measures to minimize potential biases associated with repeated testing.

Relevance for clinical practice

One of the major strengths of this study is the extended analysis of the mediating effect of CR in a sample of perinatal women, which expands understanding of CR in the perinatal context and contributes to effective management of PND. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the development of multifaceted interventions aimed at preventing or reducing depression in perinatal women.

Our findings suggest that CR is an important predictor and mediator of the occurrence and development of PND. Therefore, to effectively reduce the incidence of PND, medical staff need to pay attention to the CR level and its related factors and adopt targeted interventions. For example, healthcare professionals could focus on improving family functioning and sleep quality in women in their third trimester. Healthcare providers could help boost mindfulness levels in pregnant women through mindfulness-based stress reduction or cognitive behavioural therapy, which may help alleviate CR. Furthermore, healthcare professionals should encourage pregnant women under stress to adopt positive coping styles and provide the necessary tools and resources to effectively alleviate CR, thereby reducing depression.

Importantly, while this study did not directly measure mother-child bonding, it is crucial to recognize the significant role of a strong mother-child bond in both maternal and child well-being. Research has consistently shown that disruptions in mother-child bonding, often associated with maternal depression, can have long-term consequences for the child’s emotional regulation, behavioral development, and even physical health [51]. Therefore, interventions targeting PND should not only address maternal mental health but also incorporate strategies to support healthy mother-child interactions, as this may have far-reaching benefits for both the mother and child.

However, it should be acknowledged that this study only focused on specific psychosocial factors associated with CR. Therefore, there may be other influential factors that were not considered. In particular, future studies should explore the role of child-related variables, such as newborn character, health status, and parenting stress, as well as the dynamics of mother-child bonding, as these factors may interact with maternal CR and PND symptoms. In summary, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for health care professionals involved in the care of women with PND. To address issues arising in relation to family function, perceived stress, mindfulness, and insomnia more effectively, healthcare providers can develop targeted interventions to reduce CR and improve depression among perinatal women.

Conclusions

This study showed that CR levels in the third trimester served as stable predictors and mediators of postpartum depression, offering a theoretical foundation for the mitigation of depression in perinatal women. Overall, effective interventions aimed at reducing CR levels in perinatal women should prioritise the enhancement of family function, mindfulness, and sleep quality. Additionally, guiding women to adopt positive coping strategies to alleviate stress can reduce the occurrence and progression of postnatal depression.

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PND:

Perinatal depression

CR:

Cognitive reactivity

References

  1. Buist A. Perinatal depression—Assessment and management. Aus Fam Physician. 2006;35(9):670–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qinrui LU, Lin DING, Yanli WANG. Moderating effect of psychological resilience between prenatal perceived stress and postnatal depression among perinatal women. Chin Nurs Res. 2019;33(11):1906–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mu T-Y, Li Y-H, Pan H-F, Zhang L, Zha D-H, Zhang C-L, et al. Postpartum depressive mood (PDM) among Chinese women: A meta-analysis. Archives Women’s Mental Health. 2019;22(2):279–87. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00737-018-0885-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Payne JL, Maguire J. Pathophysiological mechanisms implicated in postpartum depression. Front Neuroendocr. 2019;52:165–80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.12.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang H, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Sun J. Association of maternal depression with dietary intake, growth, and development of preterm infants: A cohort study in Beijing, China. Front Med. 2018;12(5):533–41. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11684-017-0591-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck AT, THINKING AND DEPRESSION. II. THEORY, AND THERAPY. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1964;10:561–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/archpsyc.1964.01720240015003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van der Does W. Cognitive reactivity to sad mood: structure and validity of a new measure. Behav Res Ther. 2002;40(1):105–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00111-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Klerk-Sluis JM, Huijbers MJ, Löcke S, Spijker J, Spinhoven P, Speckens AEM, et al. Factors associated with relapse and recurrence of major depressive disorder in patients starting mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Depress Anxiety. 2022;39(2):113–22. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/da.23220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang FF, Chen W-T, Lin YA, Hong YT, Chen B. Cognitive reactivity among high-risk individuals at the first and recurrent episode of depression symptomology: A structural equation modelling analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021;30(1):334–45. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/inm.12789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu Y, Lin X, Li Y, Zhang M, Chen W-T, Huang F. Trajectories of cognitive reactivity and its predictive value on postpartum depression in Chinese women: A latent class growth modeling analysis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;44(1):2256470. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/0167482X.2023.2256470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang M-M, Ma Y, Du L-T, Wang K, Li Z, Zhu W, et al. Sleep disorders and non-sleep circadian disorders predict depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;134:104532. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Chen L. Dynamic correlation analysis between perinatal depression trajectroy and sleep quality. Beijing Med J. 2023;45(11):967–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.15932/j.0253-9713.2023.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Raes F, Dewulf D, Van Heeringen C, Williams JMG. Mindfulness and reduced cognitive reactivity to sad mood: evidence from a correlational study and a non-randomized waiting list controlled study. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(7):623–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.brat.2009.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neupert SD, Ennis GE, Ramsey JL, Gall AA. Solving tomorrow’s problems today?? daily anticipatory coping and reactivity to daily stressors. J Gerontol B. 2016;71(4):650–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/geronb/gbv003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen J, Cross WM, Plummer V, Lam L, Sun M, Qin C, et al. The risk factors of antenatal depression: A cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(19–20):3599–609. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jocn.14955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Çankaya S, Dikmen A. The effects of family function, relationship satisfaction, and dyadic adjustment on postpartum depression. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022;58(4):2460–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/ppc.13081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang QJ. Medical psychology: theory, methodology and clinical. Chin Mental Health J. 2012;26(8):576.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. 2013. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/289066201

  19. Cole DA, Maxwell SE. Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003;112(4):558–77. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vleeshouwers J, Knardahl S, Christensen JO. Effects of psychosocial work factors on number of pain sites: the role of sleep quality as mediator. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):595. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12891-019-2946-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg (London England). 2014;12(12):1495–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pan H, Liu S, Miao D, Yuan Y. Sample size determination for mediation analysis of longitudinal data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12874-018-0473-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chaaya M, Osman H, Naassan G, Mahfoud Z. Validation of the Arabic version of the Cohen perceived stress scale (PSS-10) among pregnant and postpartum women. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:111. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1471-244X-10-111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Stepowicz A, Wencka B, Bieńkiewicz J, Horzelski W, Grzesiak M. Stress and anxiety levels in pregnant and Post-Partum women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9450. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ijerph17249450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Feldman G, Hayes A, Kumar S, Greeson J, Laurenceau JP. Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2007;29(3):177. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soldatos CR, Dikeos DG, Paparrigopoulos TJ. Athens insomnia scale: validation of an instrument based on ICD-10 criteria. J Psychosom Res. 2000;48(6):555–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00095-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smilkstein G. The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Pract. 1978;6(6):1231–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang FF, Li H, Lei Y, Li Q, Chen B. Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the modified Leiden index of depression sensitivity. J Affect Disord. 2019;256:458–67. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry: J Mental Sci. 1987;150:782–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lydsdottir LB, Howard LM, Olafsdottir H, Thome M, Tyrfingsson P, Sigurdsson JF. The psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) when used prenatal. Midwifery. 2019;69:45–51. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.midw.2018.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao Y, Kane I, Wang J, Shen B, Luo J, Shi S. Combined use of the postpartum depression screening scale (PDSS) and Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) to identify antenatal depression among Chinese pregnant women with obstetric complications. Psychiatry Res. 2015;226(1):113–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiu-jing GUO, Yu-qiong WANG, Ying LIU, Jing CHEN, Xiao-fen PU. Study on the optimal critical value of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in the screening of antenatal depression. Chin J Nurs. 2009;44(9):808–10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lin SHEN, Qianhong CHEN, Hongzhuan TAN. Identification and treatment of missing data. J Cent South Univ (Medical Science). 2013;38(12):1289–94.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Y, Liu H, Zhang C, Li C, Xu J-J, Duan C-C, et al. Antepartum sleep quality, mental status, and postpartum depressive symptoms: A mediation analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):521. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12888-022-04164-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Nisar A, Yin J, Waqas A, Bai X, Wang D, Rahman A, et al. Prevalence of perinatal depression and its determinants in Mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:1022–37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu Q, Zhang X, Wang Y, Li J, Xu Y, Song X, et al. Sleep disturbances during pregnancy and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2021;58:101436. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Guerrero-Muñoz D, Salazar D, Constain V, Perez A, Pineda-Cañar CA, García-Perdomo HA. Association between family functionality and depression: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Korean J Family Med. 2021;42(2):172–80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4082/kjfm.19.0166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brodsky BS, Malone KM, Ellis SP, Dulit RA, Mann JJ. Characteristics of borderline personality disorder associated with suicidal behavior. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(12):1715–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1176/ajp.154.12.1715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kertz SJ, Petersen DR, Stevens KT. Cognitive and attentional vulnerability to depression in youth: A review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;71:63–77. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cole DA, Martin NC, Sterba SK, Sinclair-McBride K, Roeder KM, Zelkowitz R, et al. Peer victimization (and harsh parenting) as developmental correlates of cognitive reactivity, a diathesis for depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123(2):336–49. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1037/a0036489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hulsbosch LP, van de Poel E, Nyklíček I, Boekhorst MG. Trait mindfulness facets as a protective factor for the development of postpartum depressive symptoms. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;157:264–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Huang FF, Wen ZP, Li Q, Chen B, Weng WJ. Factors influencing cognitive reactivity among young adults at high risk for depression in China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):703. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12889-020-08845-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Scheyer K, Urizar GG. Altered stress patterns and increased risk for postpartum depression among low-income pregnant women. Archives Women’s Mental Health. 2016;19(2):317–28. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00737-015-0563-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou X, Xinchun W, Wenchao W, Yuxin T. The effect of social support on posttraumatic growth in adolescents: the mediating role of state hope and positive reappraisal. Psychol Dev Educ. 2017;33(5):587–94. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.05.09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Garland EL, Howard MO. Mindfulness-based treatment of addiction: current state of the field and envisioning the next wave of research. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018;13(1):14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13722-018-0115-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Huang J, Deng J, Wang Y. Mindful parenting and closeness in Chinese mother-adolescent dyads: the mediating role of adolescent self-disclosure. Fam Process. 2023;e12879. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/famp.12879.

  48. Yang Jingping G, Lingling. A review of relationship between family funetioning and psycho-physiological health of pregnant women. J Nurs Sci. 2018;33(9):110–3.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bao C, Wang Y, Le T, Xu L, Tang W, Zou W, et al. Relationship between depressive symptoms and sleep quality and cognitive Inhibition ability in prenatal pregnant women. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):522. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12888-023-04976-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Gao M, Hu J, Yang L, Ding N, Wei X, Li L, et al. Association of sleep quality during pregnancy with stress and depression: A prospective birth cohort study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):444. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12884-019-2583-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Field T. Prenatal depression risk factors, developmental effects and interventions: A review. J Pregnancy Child Health. 2017;4(1):301. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4172/2376-127X.1000301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the study participants and the English editing services from Editage.

Funding

This work did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FFH and YL contributed to the research design, revision and revision of the manuscript. QHC and HLH conducted data analysis and manuscript writing. YYL, YLL and PG contributed to data collection and proofreading. JQZ conducted data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yang Lei or Feifei Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (No. 2022085), and all participants provided signed informed consent.

Consent for publication

The data used in this study were all approved by participants prior to publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, H., Chen, Q., Lin, Y. et al. Effects of psychosocial factors on postpartum depression: a half-longitudinal mediation analysis of cognitive reactivity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 25, 296 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12884-025-07364-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12884-025-07364-y

Keywords