Skip to main content

Individualized intervention and growth dynamics assessment in TRAP sequence with conjoined twins based on radiofrequency ablation

Abstract

Background

Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence with conjoined twins (CTs) represents an exceedingly rare and critical complication in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies. High mortality rates are associated with this condition, making early diagnosis and management crucial for improving survival outcomes, particularly for the pump twin.

Case presentation

This case report focuses on a unique instance of TRAP-associated CTs, diagnosed at 13 weeks and 1 day of gestation. Management involved detailed ultrasonography and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) at 18 weeks and 5 days to interrupt the blood supply to the non-viable acardiac twin. This intervention allowed the pump twin to continue normal development, culminating in a cesarean delivery at 35 weeks and 1 day. The newborn showed a healthy postnatal outcome with no significant neurodevelopmental deficits noted at follow-up.

Conclusions

Early identification and tailored intervention are essential in cases of TRAP sequence associated with conjoined twins. This case exemplifies the potential of integrated multidisciplinary approaches and timely use of RFA, which significantly enhance the prognosis for the viable twin. These strategies are vital for managing complex MCMA pregnancies and can inform future clinical practices.

Graphical abstract

Peer Review reports

Background

Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion (TRAP) sequence is a rare complication unique to monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, with a traditionally reported incidence of approximately 1% among MC twins and 1 in 35,000 pregnancies overall. However, with the widespread application of early pregnancy ultrasonography and assisted reproductive technologies (ART), the actual incidence may be higher, estimated at 1 in 40 MC twin pregnancies and 1 in 15,000 overall pregnancies [1,2,3]. Recent meta-analyses suggest that this increase may largely reflect enhanced ultrasound sensitivity [4], while ART may contribute to a shift in baseline incidence by inducing multifetal gestations [5]. Approximately 30% of TRAP cases occur in monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancies [6, 7]. Conjoined twins (CTs), a rare subtype of MCMA twins, result from incomplete embryonic division during early development and have an extremely low incidence, ranging from 1 in 50,000 to 1 in 250,000 live births.

The hallmark of TRAP is that the acardiac twin entirely depends on the pump twin’s arterial blood supply. This perfusion occurs through placental vascular anastomoses, typically via artery-to-artery connections, or through atypical anatomical routes such as direct branches from the pump twin’s aortic arch [8,9,10]. These abnormal flow patterns are often visualized on prenatal ultrasound [11, 12]. Atypical shunting, particularly involving direct cardiac branches, may impose greater cardiovascular strain on the pump twin, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. The spontaneous miscarriage rate in TRAP pregnancies is reported to be 35–50% [11, 13, 14], and without intervention, the pump twin has a mortality risk of approximately 30% by 18 weeks of gestation [2, 15, 16]. Therefore, clinical management aims to prolong gestation and prevent complications such as heart failure and fetal hydrops.

Management options include expectant monitoring, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and laser coagulation. RFA has been widely adopted due to its minimally invasive nature and favorable success rates [2, 17], though the optimal timing of intervention, often between 14 and 18 weeks of gestation, remains debated [1, 11]. Recent advances, such as artificial intelligence combined with Doppler ultrasound for quantifying blood flow, have shown promise for guiding individualized treatment decisions [18, 19].

This study presents a rare case of TRAP sequence associated with conjoined twins, in which the acardiac twin received blood supply from a direct branch of the pump twin’s aortic arch. Through a detailed evaluation of the vascular anatomy and outcomes following RFA, this case highlights the clinical value of individualized management strategies and contributes to optimizing care for complex monochorionic pregnancies.

Case presentation

A 32-year-old Asian woman (G3P1Ab1) was referred after first-trimester ultrasonography and identified a monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA) twin pregnancy complicated by TRAP sequence. The last menstrual period was recorded as August 12, 2023. Obstetric history included a cesarean delivery of healthy twin daughters in 2014 and a spontaneous miscarriage at 8 weeks of gestation, managed by dilation and curettage. No family history of genetic disorders or congenital anomalies was reported. The partner was healthy.

Pre-pregnancy, mild hypothyroidism was diagnosed and managed with oral levothyroxine (25 µg/day), with TSH levels maintained between 1.2 and 2.5 mIU/L during pregnancy. Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) was 23.4 kg/m2. There was no history of smoking, alcohol use, radiation exposure, or teratogenic medication exposure. Ultrasound using a Voluson E10 system (GE Healthcare) revealed abnormal arterial flow from a branch of the pump twin’s aortic arch, instead of typical placental umbilical vessel anastomoses. The vessel coursed along the pump twin’s anterior abdominal wall and entered the acardiac twin through a 6.0-mm-wide conjoined region (Fig. 1a-c), indicating a shared cardiac circulation. At 13 + 1 weeks, MCMA twin pregnancy was confirmed. One fetus was diagnosed as an acardiac twin measuring 3.3 × 1.9 cm, with absent cardiac structures and severely underdeveloped head and torso (Fig. 2a). At 17 + 2 weeks, the acardiac twin showed significant edema and grew to 5.1 × 3.2 cm, while the pump twin had a normal heart rate and umbilical artery Doppler without cardiac dysfunction. By 18 + 3 weeks, the acardiac twin had rapidly enlarged to 7.9 × 4.3 cm (Fig. 2b), growing faster than typically reported in TRAP cases [20, 21]. A multidisciplinary team (obstetrics, fetal medicine, ultrasonography, genetics, pediatrics) determined that continued growth of the acardiac twin posed a high risk of pump twin cardiac failure and recommended immediate intervention.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Blood supply to the acardiac twin and conjoined area. Note: (a) The blood supply to the acardiac twin originates from a branch of the pump twin’s aortic arch; (b) Vessels near the attachment site of the pump twin’s umbilical cord; (c) The conjoined area between the acardiac twin and the pump twin, with the connection area highlighted. The images were obtained using two-dimensional ultrasound, showing the vascular anastomosis and the conjoined fetal structures

Fig. 2
figure 2

Ultrasound images of the acardiac twin. Note: (a) Ultrasound image of the acardiac twin at 13 weeks and 1 day of gestation, with the fetal size measuring 3.3 × 1.9 cm (b) Ultrasound image of the acardiac twin at 18 weeks and 3 days of gestation, with the fetal size measuring 7.9 × 4.3 cm. The images were obtained using standard two-dimensional ultrasound with abdominal scanning, displaying the morphology and growth of the acardiac twin

At 18 + 5 weeks, ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed. Under sterile conditions and local anesthesia, transabdominal ultrasound identified the feeding vessel from the pump twin’s aortic arch. A 17G needle was inserted obliquely through the abdominal wall, avoiding the pump twin and placenta, and advanced to the proximal segment of the vessel. Ablation was delivered at an initial power of 25 W, increasing to 35 W, with two cycles lasting 4 min 30 s and 1 min 50 s, respectively (total 6 min 20 s). Color Doppler confirmed complete vessel occlusion and cessation of blood flow to the acardiac twin (Fig. 3a-b). Postoperative monitoring showed a pump twin heart rate of 138 bpm and umbilical artery resistance index (RI) of 0.61 without complications. By day 12, the conjoined region had thinned from 6.0 mm to 4.7 mm, and the acardiac twin had detached.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of blood supply vessels before and after RFA. Note: (a) Color Doppler ultrasound image of the acardiac twin’s blood supply vessels before RFA, with the green box indicating the location of the blood supply vessels; (b) Color Doppler ultrasound image after RFA showing the occlusion of the blood supply vessels, with the green box marking the area where the vessels have disappeared. The images were obtained using standard two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler techniques, showing the changes in blood flow before and after RFA

Mid- to late-gestation ultrasound monitoring showed that the pump twin’s growth followed the INTERGROWTH-21st standard, with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of 2.3 kg (P45) at 34 weeks. The acardiac twin gradually regressed in size to 5.8 × 1.5 cm. At 34 + 5 weeks, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurred, and antenatal corticosteroids (dexamethasone) were administered for fetal lung maturation. At 35 + 1 weeks, an emergency cesarean section was performed, delivering a male infant (Fig. 4a) weighing 2.6 kg, measuring 45 cm in length, with an Apgar score of 9. Postnatal echocardiography revealed a 3.1 mm atrial septal defect, a 1.2 mm patent foramen ovale, and a 1.9 mm patent ductus arteriosus. The cranial ultrasound was unremarkable. At a 6-week follow-up, cardiac defects had closed spontaneously, and neurodevelopment was normal.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Surviving pump twin and acardiac twin. Note: (a) The surviving male infant after delivery; (b) The white arrow indicates the conjoined area between the pump twin and the acardiac twin, showing the location of the connection; (c) The acardiac twin, displaying its morphology

Placental pathology identified a 1.2 mm-diameter artery extending from a branch of the pump twin’s aortic arch to the acardiac twin. The vessel wall showed intact smooth muscle and no intimal hyperplasia (Fig. 4b). The acardiac twin, measuring 6.0 cm in length and 6.0 × 3.0 × 1.5 cm in volume (Fig. 4c), received its entire blood supply from this direct arterial connection. Fibrotic and necrotic tissue was observed in the conjoined region. Growth curve analysis showed that the acardiac twin’s weight increased from 7.5 g at 13 + 1 weeks to 92.7 g at 18 + 3 weeks, significantly lower than expected for gestational age (Table 1). The pump twin’s weight consistently remained within the normal range (P10-P90), with a birth weight of 2.6 kg (Fig. 5a-b). Notably, from 15 + 2 to 18 + 3 weeks, the acardiac twin exhibited accelerated growth, with an average daily weight gain of 3.2 g, possibly due to the direct cardiac arterial supply [22].

Table 1 Biometrical measurement results of the acardiac twin and the pump twin
Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of growth curves between the acardiac twin and pump twin. Note: (a) Growth curve of the acardiac twin, with weight estimated using the formula: Weight (g) = 1.2 × (maximum length in cm)² - (1.7 × maximum length in cm) (Moore TR, 1990); (b) Growth curve of the pump twin, with weight estimated based on the INTERGROWTH-21st standards

This case features an acardiac twin supplied by a cardiac branch of the pump twin, an uncommon anatomy that may accelerate acardiac growth and increase the hemodynamic burden. In TRAP cases with conjoined twins, miscarriage rates can reach 50%, and pump twin survival with conservative management is 50–70% [2, 11]. RFA may raise survival to 85–90% [17]. Although intervention at 18 + 5 weeks was effective, treatment at 12 to 14 weeks may further reduce risk [23, 24]. This case lacked a third-trimester fetal brain MRI. Ongoing neurodevelopmental follow-up is warranted.

Discussion

TRAP sequence with conjoined twins is an extremely rare and high-risk complication of MCMA twin pregnancies [25]. Its core pathology involves the acardiac twin surviving entirely on arterial blood supplied by the pump twin. Due to the absence of cardiac structures, the acardiac twin has a near 100% mortality rate, while the pump twin mortality rate ranges from 50 to 55% [1, 26]. In MCMA twin pregnancies, only about 70% of fetuses survive, and approximately half of the losses are associated with TRAP or conjoined twins. A comprehensive PubMed search identified 17 relevant studies (Table 2), including 5 case reports, 1 guideline, 2 retrospective studies, 3 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, 3 narrative reviews on ultrasound and fetal assessment, 1 prospective study, and 2 case series. These studies consistently emphasize that early diagnosis and individualized intervention are key to improving outcomes.

Table 2 Summary of literature on TRAP syndrome and conjoined twins

This case is the first to report an anatomical variation in the TRAP sequence with conjoined twins, in which the acardiac twin received blood directly from a branch of the pump twin’s aortic arch. As of 2023, none of the five previously reported cases of TRAP with conjoined twins in the PubMed database [27,28,29,30,31] described this vascular pattern. Unlike typical placental vascular anastomoses, a direct cardiac arterial supply may create a shared cardiac output system, accelerating metabolic activity in the acardiac twin and increasing hemodynamic load on the pump twin. In this case, the acardiac twin gained an average of 3.2 g daily from 15 + 2 to 18 + 3 weeks. These findings suggest that the hemodynamic mechanism of TRAP may vary significantly due to abnormal embryonic vascular development. High-resolution ultrasound combined with genetic analysis may help clarify the etiology. Identifying such atypical vascular pathways highlights the importance of advanced imaging techniques, particularly color Doppler ultrasound, in detecting abnormal flow early. Without a timely diagnosis, misclassification as placental teratoma or vanishing twin syndrome may occur [32, 33]. Diagnosis in this case was made at 13 + 1 weeks, enabling timely intervention planning and emphasizing the essential role of first-trimester ultrasound in TRAP management.

Management of the TRAP sequence with conjoined twins requires careful consideration of anatomical features and procedural risks. Although RFA successfully interrupted abnormal blood flow in this case, laser coagulation has also been used in cases with clearly defined placental anastomoses. Literature suggests that laser techniques can precisely occlude vascular connections [34], but the procedure is technically demanding and poses a higher risk of collateral damage, particularly in conjoined twins with complex anatomy. In this case, the acardiac twin received blood from a deep-seated branch of the pump twin’s aortic arch. Given this vascular configuration, RFA under real-time ultrasound guidance was considered a safer approach [17]. Systematic reviews have shown that RFA offers a higher success rate (92%) and lower complication rate (8%) compared to laser coagulation [35]. Compared with conservative management, which carries a 30% mortality rate for the pump twin, RFA significantly improves survival to over 90%, particularly in cases with rapid acardiac twin growth [2].

Clinical management of the TRAP sequence with conjoined twins relies heavily on the timing of intervention. In this case, RFA was successfully performed at 18 + 5 weeks. Postoperative hemodynamics of the pump twin remained stable, and a healthy delivery was achieved, with a birth weight of 2.6 kg and an Apgar score of 9. Although the optimal timing remains debated, literature generally supports the window of 16 to 18 weeks as a balance between procedural safety and fetal outcome [36, 37]. Earlier intervention between 12 and 14 weeks may reduce the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes [23] but must be weighed against technical challenges and increased risk of fetal injury at earlier gestational ages. This case demonstrates that mid-gestation RFA can effectively occlude abnormal blood flow in TRAP with atypical vascular anatomy without major complications, providing a clinical reference for similar cases. Real-time ultrasound guidance enabled precise targeting of the feeding vessel. Intraoperative monitoring of the pump twin’s cardiac function, including umbilical artery resistance index and ductus venosus waveform, contributed to procedural safety and efficacy.

Multidisciplinary collaboration was essential in this case. Teams in obstetrics, imaging, genetics, and neonatology jointly assessed acardiac twin growth and pump twin development, leading to timely intervention. After the procedure, the conjoined region reduced from 6.0 mm to 4.7 mm within 12 days, and the acardiac twin detached. This outcome supports the value of coordinated care in reducing complications such as preterm birth and infection, while improving procedural success [19].

This study has limitations. Fetal brain MRI was not performed in late gestation, limiting neurodevelopment assessment. In addition, the single-center retrospective design and small sample size may not reflect the full range of TRAP presentations. Larger multicenter studies with long-term follow-up are needed to explore the pathophysiology of atypical vascular patterns and to optimize RFA timing. Ultrasound radiomics and machine learning may enhance individualized treatment planning by predicting acardiac twin growth and pump twin cardiac adaptation.

In conclusion, early diagnosis, timely intervention, and multidisciplinary care are key to improving outcomes in TRAP with conjoined twins. This case shows that mid-gestation RFA targeting a cardiac branch supply can be effective. Further validation through larger studies and improved imaging methods is needed to guide management in similar high-risk pregnancies.

Conclusion

This study reports the first TRAP case with conjoined twins where the acardiac twin was perfused via a cardiac branch of the pump twin. Mid-gestation RFA effectively blocked the abnormal supply and improved the outcome. Early diagnosis at 13 + 1 weeks, individualized monitoring, and multidisciplinary care led to a healthy delivery at 35 + 1 weeks, with a birth weight of 2.6 kg and normal postnatal development (Graphic abstract). The case highlights a rare vascular variant, supports RFA safety, and introduces a monitoring approach. Despite limitations such as single-center data and lack of fetal brain MRI, the findings offer a basis for refined TRAP management. Future studies should combine multicenter data with AI-based tools to improve decision-making.

Data availability

Data used for analysis are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AC:

Abdominal Circumference

BMI:

Body Mass Index

EFW:

Estimated Fetal Weight

LMP:

Last Menstrual Period

MC:

Monochorionic

MCMA:

Monochorionic Monoamniotic

RFA:

Radiofrequency Ablation

TRAP:

Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion

CTs:

Conjoined Twins

References

  1. Shettikeri A, Acharya V, Sahana VS, Radhakrishnan R. Outcome of pregnancies diagnosed with TRAP sequence prenatally: A Single-Centre experience. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;47:301–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brock CO, Johnson A. Twin reverse arterial perfusion: timing of intervention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022;84:127–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yıldırım E. Spontaneous triplet pregnancy and trap sequence, case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19.

  4. Magnusson Å, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, Pinborg A, Petzold M et al. The association between high birth weight and Long-Term Outcomes—Implications for assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pead. 2021;9.

  5. Chen M, Heilbronn LK. The health outcomes of human offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). J Dev Origins Health Disease. 2017;8:388–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khairudin D, Khalil A. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022;84:96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kozinszky Z, Surányi A. The High-Risk profile of selective growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Medicina. 2023;59:648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Liu H, Huang S, Tong C, Wang Z, Qi H et al. Alterations in fetal doppler parameters before and Twenty-Four hours after radiofrequency ablation for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Front Med. 2022;9.

  9. Nicolì P, Damiani GR, Gaetani M, Dellino M, Vitagliano A, Malvasi A et al. The Strange Case of Dr Pump and Mr Acardiac: The Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion (TRAP) Sequence in Two Monochorionic Monoamniotic (MCMA) Twin Pregnancies—Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management: Review of Literature. Diagnostics. 2023;13:3109.

  10. Steffensen TS, Gilbert-Barness E, Spellacy W, Quintero RA. PLACENTAL PATHOLOGY IN TRAP SEQUENCE: CLINICAL AND PATHOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2008;27:13–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vitucci A, Fichera A, Fratelli N, Sartori E, Prefumo F. Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence: Current Treatment Options International Journal of Women’s Health. 2020;Volume 12:435–43.

  12. Amer Sa, Abdulmalik, Alshoabi SA, Qurashi AA, Alhazmi FH, Al-Rudini RY. Ultrasound doppler findings of a twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAP). Pakistan J Med Sci. 2023;40.

  13. Weber MA, Sebire NJ. Genetics and developmental pathology of twinning. Seminars Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15:313–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weber EC, Recker F, Gottschalk I, Strizek B, Geipel A, Gembruch U, et al. Outcome of monochorionic monoamniotic twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48:778–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewi L, Valencia C, Gonzalez E, Deprest J, Nicolaides KH. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:e2131–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mone F, Devaseelan P, Ong S. Intervention versus a Conservative approach in the management of TRAP sequence: a systematic review. J Perinat Med. 2016;44.

  17. Komatsu EJ, Hamzeh C, Hamadeh G, Llanes A, Korst LM, Chmait RH. Cord occlusion in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: A retrospective study of laser photocoagulation versus radiofrequency ablation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024;:1–8.

  18. Burtan D, Burn JF, Spehar B, Leonards U. The effect of image fractal properties and its interaction with visual discomfort on gait kinematics. Sci Rep. 2023;13.

  19. Stellon MA, Joshi DS, Beninati M, Antony KM, Bohrer J, Hinshaw JL, et al. Management of twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence with microwave ablation: A case report and review of the literature. J Clin Ultrasound. 2024;52:1208–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Ismail LC, Lambert A, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Lancet. 2014;384:869–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181:129–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong AE, Sepulveda W. Acardiac anomaly: current issues in prenatal assessment and treatment. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:796–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan TYT, Sepulveda W. Acardiac twin: a systematic review of minimally invasive treatment modalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cabassa P, Fichera A, Prefumo F, Taddei F, Gandolfi S, Maroldi R, et al. The use of radiofrequency in the treatment of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproductive Biology. 2013;166:127–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Mieghem T, Abbasi N, Shinar S, Keunen J, Seaward G, Windrim R, et al. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4:100520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Khalil A, Binder J, Waring G, Sturgiss SN, et al. Prevalence, antenatal management and perinatal outcome of monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: a collaborative multicenter study in England, 2000–2013. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;53:184–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanjaghsaz H, Bayram MO, Qureshi F. Twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence in conjoined, acardiac, acephalic twins associated with a normal triplet. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:1046–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan H, Zhou Q, Li J, Zeng S. Triplet pregnancy from the transfer of two blastocysts demonstrating a twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence with a conjoined-twins pump fetus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;137:196–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Galinkin JL, Gaiser RR, Cohen DE, Crombleholme TM, Johnson M, Kurth CD. Anesthesia for fetoscopic fetal surgery: twin reverse arterial perfusion sequence and twin-Twin transfusions syndrome. Anesth Analgesia. 2000;91:1394–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fishman SJ, Puder M, Geva T, Jenkins K, Ziegler MM, Shamberger RC. Cardiac relocation and chest wall reconstruction after separation of thoracopagus conjoined twins with a single heart. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:515–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. MacKenzie AP, Stephenson CD, Funai EF, Lee M-J, Timor-Tritsch I. Three-dimensional ultrasound to differentiate epigastric heteropagus conjoined twins from a TRAP sequence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1736–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dhanju G, Breddam A. Twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence: A case report and a brief literature review. Radiol Case Rep. 2022;17:1682–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruiz-Cordero R, Birusingh RJ, Pelaez L, Azouz M, Rodriguez MM. Twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS): an illustrative series of 13 cases. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2016;35:63–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Berg C, Holst D, Mallmann MR, Gottschalk I, Gembruch U, Geipel A. Earlyvslate intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:60–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stellon MA, Joshi DS, Beninati MJ, Leverson G, Yang Q, Antony KM et al. Management of twin-reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024;:1–26.

  36. Moreno Escobar JJ, Morales Matamoros O, Aguilar del Villar EY, Quintana Espinosa H, Chanona Hernández L. DS-CNN: deep convolutional neural networks for facial emotion detection in children with down syndrome during Dolphin-Assisted therapy. Healthcare. 2023;11:2295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ozawa K, Wada S, Muromoto J, Sugibayashi R, Wada YS, Ito Y, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of the pump twin in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence treated by radiofrequency ablation. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41:1575–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Province (No: 20212BAG70006 and 20242BAB25447), the Science and Technology Plan of Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission (No: 202110093) and Funded by Jiangxi Provincial Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hua Lai and Huiting Zhu contributed equally to this work and share first authorship. Hua Lai, Huiting Zhu, and Jinliang Zhang were responsible for clinical data collection, case monitoring, and manuscript drafting. Juhua Xiao and Xin Zhou performed and interpreted the ultrasound examinations. Mengjiao Liu and Danping Liu contributed to data analysis and literature review. Zengming Li and Xin Zhou supervised the clinical management and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zengming Li or Xin Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All data were obtained with the patient’s consent, and we have received formal approval from the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of our hospital to publish this report (Ethics Approval Number: EC-JS-202101).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, H., Zhu, H., Zhang, J. et al. Individualized intervention and growth dynamics assessment in TRAP sequence with conjoined twins based on radiofrequency ablation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 25, 584 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12884-025-07658-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12884-025-07658-1

Keywords